Amy Sherald is a celebrated contemporary artist known for her striking portraits that challenge traditional narratives of Black identity. She gained widespread recognition after painting the official portrait of former First Lady Michelle Obama in 2018. Her signature style, characterized by grayscale skin tones, vibrant backgrounds, and carefully composed figures, has established her as a leading voice in American figurative painting. This article explores Sherald’s artistic journey, her unique techniques, and the profound impact of her work.
Amy Sherald: Redefining Black Portraiture in Contemporary Art
Early Life and Education
Amy Sherald was born in Columbus, Georgia, in 1973. Growing up in the American South, she witnessed firsthand the racial and social inequalities that would later influence her work. While her family valued education and encouraged a professional career outside of the arts, Sherald pursued her passion for painting.
She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in painting from Clark Atlanta University, a historically Black university, in 1997. During her studies, she apprenticed under artist Arturo Lindsay, who helped shape her understanding of portraiture and cultural storytelling. Later, she attended the Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA), where she received her Master of Fine Arts degree in 2004.
Artistic Style and Techniques
Amy Sherald’s paintings are immediately recognizable due to her distinctive aesthetic choices. She employs a meticulous approach to portraiture, blending realism with surreal and symbolic elements. Her work often includes the following characteristics:
1. Grayscale Skin Tones
One of Sherald’s most striking artistic decisions is the use of grayscale for her subjects’ skin, a technique that removes racial identifiers and references the historical tradition of Black-and-white photography. This approach allows viewers to focus on the subject’s presence and individuality rather than racial constructs. Sherald has stated that this technique is a way of decontextualizing Black identity from stereotypical representations.
2. Vibrant Backgrounds and Clothing
While the subjects' skin tones remain muted, Sherald contrasts them with bright, bold backgrounds and colorful clothing. These backgrounds are often solid or feature simple geometric patterns, drawing attention to the figures while suggesting a dreamlike or symbolic space. The clothing choices are often contemporary, inspired by fashion photography, thrift stores, and historical references.
3. Capturing Everyday Black Joy and Dignity
Sherald’s subjects exude quiet confidence, dignity, and a sense of calm. Her paintings often depict ordinary people—sometimes acquaintances, sometimes strangers she meets on the street—posed in ways that suggest both self-awareness and resilience. By portraying Black individuals in casual, everyday settings with a regal presence, Sherald disrupts historical narratives that have overlooked or marginalized such representations.
4. Flat, Stylized Composition
Unlike traditional portraiture, which often emphasizes depth and shadow, Sherald employs a flatter, more stylized approach. Her figures stand out against minimalistic backgrounds, reinforcing their significance and focusing attention on their expressions, gestures, and clothing.
Notable Works
1. "Michelle Obama" (2018)
Sherald’s most famous painting is undoubtedly her official portrait of Michelle Obama, commissioned for the National Portrait Gallery. The piece, featuring the former First Lady in a flowing dress with geometric patterns, broke conventional expectations of political portraiture. The muted tones and serene yet powerful pose captured Obama’s grace and intellect while also challenging traditional depictions of public figures.
2. "Planes, Rockets, and the Spaces in Between" (2018)
This painting depicts a young boy in a superhero costume, representing childhood dreams and aspirations. The work plays with the concept of imagination and identity, reinforcing themes of empowerment and self-discovery.
3. "They Call Me Redbone but I’d Rather Be Strawberry Shortcake" (2009)
In this work, a young Black woman poses confidently in a red polka-dot dress, her gaze direct and self-assured. The title references cultural identity and language, prompting viewers to consider the implications of labels and personal identity.
4. "A Wonderful Dream" (2021)
This piece features a man and a woman on bicycles, representing leisure, freedom, and movement. It highlights Sherald’s continued exploration of joy as an act of resistance and a celebration of Black life.
Cultural and Artistic Impact
Amy Sherald’s art plays a crucial role in redefining Black portraiture in contemporary art. Her work challenges historical misrepresentations and offers an alternative vision—one that emphasizes Black individuality, agency, and joy.
1. Representation in Art
Sherald’s portraits offer a counter-narrative to the often-limited representations of Black people in Western art history. By portraying Black individuals in dignified and introspective ways, she expands the possibilities of how Black identity is depicted and understood in the visual arts.
2. Political and Social Commentary
While Sherald’s work is not overtly political, it carries subtle yet powerful messages about race, identity, and visibility. The deliberate choice to use grayscale skin tones, combined with bright and joyful elements, serves as a reminder of both historical erasure and the resilience of Black communities.
3. Influence on Contemporary Art
As a leading figure in contemporary portraiture, Sherald has influenced a new generation of artists who explore race, identity, and representation. Her success has also paved the way for other Black artists to gain recognition in the mainstream art world.
A Well Rounded Critique of Amy Sherald's Oeuvre
Amy Sherald has cemented her place in contemporary American portraiture with her signature grayscale figures, minimalist backgrounds, and carefully composed subjects. She is widely celebrated, especially for her official portrait of Michelle Obama, and has been lauded for her contributions to Black representation in art. However, despite her acclaim, Sherald’s work is not without its shortcomings.
While her stylistic choices are deliberate and distinct, they often raise concerns about depth, emotional engagement, and technical execution. Her approach, though visually striking at first glance, can feel formulaic and detached, lacking the complexity and nuance expected from portraiture that seeks to redefine Black identity. This critique will explore the limitations of Sherald’s work in terms of artistic depth, technique, emotional resonance, and conceptual execution.
1. The Overuse of Grayscale
One of Sherald’s most defining artistic choices is replacing the skin tones of her figures with a blurry grayscale. This technique quickly becomes repetitive and, at times, feels more like a weakened color palette rather than a meaningful artistic decision.
The decision to giving away natural skin tones arguably flattens the individuality of the figures rather than celebrating it. By reducing all subjects to the same gray monochromatic palette, Sherald removes the rich variation and warmth that visually engage viewers, diminishing the retinal pleasure that can be essential in evoking emotional responses. The consistent use of gray monochromatic skin tones across all her paintings results in a sense of predictability, ultimately reducing their potential for a striking or unexpected visual impact.
2. Sherald’s compositions devoid deeper symbolism
Sherald’s compositions often feature subjects posed against solid-color backgrounds. While this minimalism serves to highlight her figures, it also strips the portraits of environmental context, which can be crucial in storytelling and capturing the viewers' attention for enough time to interact with the painting emotionally.
Many of her paintings suffer from a lack of depth, both in physical space and psychological presence and her figures often feel disconnected from their surroundings may be because Sherald’s backgrounds devoid of deeper symbolism. Also, the absence of dynamic compositions and the miss use of the negative space of her paintings makes many of her portraits feel stiff stagnant and boring.
3. Emotional Detachment and Lack of Psychological Depth
Portraiture has long been a genre that captures not just physical likeness but also inner complexity, yet Sherald’s figures often appear emotionally muted.
Sherald’s subjects expressions rarely suggest a deep internal world, making it difficult for the viewer to connect on an emotional level.
Though her work is praised for “celebrating Black joy,” it often lacks the emotional range needed to make that joy feel profound. Many of her Portraiture appear more like fashion magazine models than artistic creations reflecting deep lived experiences.
4. Technical Limitations and Lack of Evolution
While Sherald's technique does not always reflect a high level of technical mastery, especially compared to other contemporary figurative artists, her paintings are executed in a flat, almost graphic manner, lacking expressive, spontaneous marks that might reflect her feelings and thoughts during the painting process. This stylization makes her work feel more illustrative than experimental in the realm of artistic painting.
Furthermore, Sherald’s techniques have remained largely unevolved. Her reliance on static technical approaches has become predictable, raising concerns about whether her art originates from a deep conceptual artistic exploration.
Conclusion
Amy Sherald has undeniably made an impact in contemporary portraiture, but her work remains controversial in terms of depth and technical rigor. While her distinct aesthetic has brought her widespread attention, it often falls short of delivering true psychological engagement or formal complexity.
Her paintings, though visually striking, run the risk of becoming decorative rather than deeply evocative. Without further artistic evolution, her work may not stand the test of time in the way that truly great portraiture does.
Sherald’s success raises important questions: Is she being praised primarily for her artistic contributions, or is her acclaim largely driven by external institutional pressures? More importantly, can she push past her signature style and evolve into an artist whose work truly resonates beyond its surface appeal?
Comments