Hilma af Klint (1862-1944), a Swedish painter and mystic, is now considered a pioneer of abstract art, preceding famous figures like Wassily Kandinsky, Kazimir Malevich, and Piet Mondrian. However, for many years, her work remained largely unknown and hidden from public view. This was due to af Klint's own insistence that her paintings should not be shown until at least 20 years after her death, as she believed they would be misunderstood. Her work was not only revolutionary in its abstraction but was deeply rooted in spiritualism, esoteric philosophies, and the occult, making her artistic journey as enigmatic as it was groundbreaking.
However, despite the newfound enthusiasm surrounding her oeuvre, a critical assessment reveals several issues that challenge her artistic legacy. While af Klint’s work is often lauded for its supposed spiritual depth, visionary compositions, and innovative abstraction, a closer examination exposes weaknesses in artistic rigor, conceptual coherence, and technical execution.
The Occult Abstract Paintings by Hilma af Klint
Early Life and Spiritual Awakening
Hilma af Klint was born in 1862 in Solna, Sweden. She studied at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Stockholm, one of the first women to do so, and initially focused on naturalistic themes such as landscapes and botanical drawings. But her art took a radical turn in 1906 when she began exploring more abstract and mystical forms.
The turn towards abstraction was closely linked to af Klint's deep interest in spiritualism and the occult, popular movements in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this time, there was a surge of interest in the unseen worlds, including séances, Theosophy, and Anthroposophy. The desire to transcend the material world resonated with af Klint, who believed that art could serve as a medium to communicate with spiritual realms.
The Five: A Circle of Spiritual Seekers
A significant part of af Klint's spiritual exploration involved her membership in The Five (De Fem), a group of women artists and mystics who conducted séances and sought communication with higher spiritual beings. The group was formed in 1896 and met regularly to engage in spiritual practices, automatic drawing, and meditation. It was during these sessions that af Klint began to receive what she believed were messages from otherworldly entities—whom they referred to as "High Masters"—that guided her to create her abstract works.
This experience became a pivotal point in af Klint's career. She felt that she was a conduit, or a medium, through which spiritual knowledge could manifest visually. The mystical messages she received shaped her art, prompting her to produce work that she believed transcended the material realm and was intended for a future audience.
The Paintings for the Temple: A Spiritual Journey
The most significant body of work that emerged from af Klint's spiritual explorations is a series called The Paintings for the Temple, created between 1906 and 1915. This series of 193 paintings is often considered her magnum opus. These works were meant to be displayed in a spiral-shaped temple, reflecting her vision of spiritual ascension.
The paintings themselves are characterized by geometric shapes, vibrant colors, and organic forms that symbolize spiritual concepts like the evolution of the soul, the duality of existence, and the relationship between the physical and the metaphysical. Af Klint's use of circles, spirals, and radiant colors prefigured many of the abstract works that would later emerge in the 20th century.
For example, her Primordial Chaos series uses overlapping circles, ellipses, and symbols to represent the chaotic but fertile energy that underlies creation. The Ten Largest series, one of the most famous subsets of The Paintings for the Temple, portrays different stages of human life—childhood, youth, adulthood, and old age—through large-scale canvases full of swirling, vibrant patterns and symbols.
Symbolism and Esoteric Imagery
Af Klint's paintings are filled with symbols and forms drawn from spiritual traditions, Theosophy, Rosicrucianism, and other esoteric beliefs. Her works frequently include motifs such as spirals, snakes, shells, flowers, and wings, each carrying a specific spiritual significance. She used the spiral as a symbol of evolution and spiritual growth, while the snake often represented transformation and rebirth.
Her understanding of dualities also plays a critical role in her work. Many of her paintings explore themes of opposing forces—light and dark, male and female, matter and spirit. These dualities are represented through the use of contrasting colors and symmetrical compositions. In Group X, No. 1, Altarpiece, af Klint uses an upward-pointing triangle (often representing masculinity) and a downward-pointing triangle (femininity) intersecting, suggesting a merging of opposites in the process of spiritual evolution.
Af Klint also developed her own symbolic language, using letters, numbers, and abstract forms that functioned as a kind of esoteric code. This personalized symbolism added layers of meaning to her work, making them rich in metaphysical significance and inviting multiple interpretations.
The Role of Women in Spiritualism and Modern Art
Hilma af Klint's work also stands out for the way it intersects with the role of women in the early modern art movement. As a woman working at a time when the art world was dominated by men, af Klint's spiritual orientation allowed her to operate somewhat outside the traditional boundaries of the art establishment. Her connection to the spiritual realm gave her a sense of purpose that was not bound by the expectations of contemporary art critics or the market.
Her involvement with The Five and her spiritual practices offered her a form of creative agency and community that was rare for women of her time. It was within this context that she felt empowered to push the boundaries of what art could be and to explore abstract forms before her male contemporaries.
Rediscovery and Legacy
For decades, Hilma af Klint's contribution to abstract art remained obscured. After her death in 1944, af Klint left behind more than 1,200 paintings and 125 notebooks, with instructions that her work should remain hidden for at least 20 years. It was not until the late 1980s that her work began to gain attention through exhibitions that reintroduced her art to the world. Her first major retrospective took place in 2013 at the Moderna Museet in Stockholm, sparking renewed interest in her life and work.
The 2018 Guggenheim exhibition Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the Future further cemented her place in art history. It attracted a record number of visitors, many of whom were struck by the novelty and depth of her work. The exhibition not only highlighted her visionary abstract forms but also emphasized the spiritual dimensions of her art, which set her apart from other abstract artists of her time.
Today, Hilma af Klint is increasingly recognized as a visionary who anticipated key aspects of abstract art. Her work challenges the conventional narrative of art history, which often begins with Kandinsky's abstract paintings in 1910. Instead, af Klint’s legacy invites us to reconsider the origins of abstraction and the role of spiritualism in shaping the modernist impulse.
A Balanced Critique of Hilma af Klint's Art
Thematic and Conceptual Shortcomings
Aesthetic and Compositional Weaknesses
Questionable Innovation and Artistic Influence
The Romanticization of a “Lost” Female Artist
Thematic and Conceptual Shortcomings
Af Klint’s work is deeply rooted in spiritualism and mysticism, particularly Theosophy and Anthroposophy, which heavily influenced her artistic practice. While spirituality has undeniably shaped many great artists' works, af Klint’s reliance on esoteric doctrines often results in a lack of conceptual clarity. Her paintings frequently appear as mere visual translations of occult symbols, rather than original artistic explorations of form and meaning. Unlike other artists who successfully integrated metaphysical themes into their art (e.g., Kazimir Malevich or Piet Mondrian), af Klint’s reliance on predetermined symbolic systems limits the interpretive richness of her paintings. Rather than inviting a dynamic interplay between form and content, her work frequently feels dictated by rigid spiritualist dogma.
Aesthetic and Compositional Weaknesses
One of the major criticisms of af Klint’s work lies in its compositional structure. Many of her paintings lack a sense of balance, rhythm, or depth that one finds in the best abstract art. Her color choices, while often vibrant, sometimes feel arbitrary rather than intentional. Unlike Kandinsky, who meticulously studied the psychological impact of color and shape, af Klint's application of form and hue appears to follow an instinctual rather than an analytical approach. This results in paintings that can seem visually cluttered or compositionally unresolved.
Moreover, her brushwork is often imprecise, with awkward transitions and inconsistencies in execution. While some might argue that this lends her work an organic or spontaneous quality, in reality, it detracts from the sophistication and finesse expected from a leading figure of early modernist abstraction. Compared to contemporaries such as Paul Klee, whose work exhibits both spontaneity and careful design, af Klint’s paintings often seem underdeveloped or amateurish.
Questionable Innovation and Artistic Influence
Af Klint’s advocates often claim she was the true originator of abstract art, yet this assertion is problematic. While it is true that she created abstract works before Kandinsky’s first acknowledged abstract compositions, the historical and artistic context of her practice complicates such claims. Af Klint worked in near-total isolation, producing paintings largely for personal or spiritual purposes, and she deliberately kept her work from public view. Her insistence that her art remain hidden for decades after her death means that she had no tangible influence on the trajectory of modernist abstraction. Innovation in art is not merely about chronological precedence but about impact and dialogue within the artistic community. Without this engagement, her work, regardless of its originality, remained detached from the larger currents of modernist development.
Furthermore, the suggestion that af Klint’s work should be viewed on par with, or even above, that of artists like Kandinsky, Malevich, or Mondrian is tenuous at best. These artists actively participated in the art world, published manifestos, debated theories, and engaged with other artists to shape the development of abstraction. Af Klint, in contrast, remained outside this discourse, which raises questions about the extent to which her work can be genuinely considered part of the modernist movement rather than a personal and esoteric endeavor.
The Romanticization of a “Lost” Female Artist
There is no denying that the art world has historically marginalized female artists, and the recent surge of interest in af Klint is partially a corrective to this imbalance. However, in the eagerness to elevate her status, there is a tendency to overlook the flaws in her work. The mythologization of af Klint as a forgotten genius unfairly distorts the historical narrative. Rather than assessing her work purely on its artistic merits, many discussions frame her as a victim of patriarchal neglect, which risks placing ideology above critical evaluation.
While it is commendable that previously overlooked artists are being reconsidered, it is equally important to scrutinize their work with the same rigor applied to their male counterparts. Af Klint’s artistic limitations should not be ignored simply because she represents an underrepresented demographic in art history.
Conclusion: Art Beyond the Material World
Hilma af Klint’s art is undeniably intriguing, particularly in its connection to spiritualist traditions and its unexpected temporal precedence in abstraction. However, upon closer examination, her work suffers from conceptual rigidity, compositional weaknesses, and a lack of technical refinement. Her historical relevance, while significant, should not be exaggerated to the extent that it overshadows the genuine artistic achievements of her more technically accomplished and theoretically engaged contemporaries.
The reevaluation of neglected artists is necessary and valuable, but it should not come at the cost of critical discernment. Af Klint’s legacy, while notable, is not without its artistic shortcomings, and these should be acknowledged in any balanced assessment of her work.
The next time you stand in front of an abstract painting, remember, that it all started as an occult message from Hilma Af Klint's Höga Mästare.
Comentarios